Saturday, March 30, 2019

Trump tariffs costing US consumers $1.4 billion per month, study shows

The Trump administration's trade policies and tariffs reduced U.S. income at a rate of $1.4 billion per month by the end of last November, according to new research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Princeton University and Columbia University.

The collaborative study found that U.S. businesses and consumers saw "substantial increases" in the price of goods throughout last year, including a "complete passthrough" of U.S.-imposed tariffs onto imported items. The economists — the New York Fed's Mary Amiti, Princeton professor Stephen Redding and Columbia professor David Weinstein — also said Americans suffered by a lack of import variety and disruptions to supply chains.

"Economists have long argued that there are real income losses from import protection. Using the evidence to date from the 2018 trade war, we find empirical support for these arguments," the researchers wrote. "Losses mounted steadily over the year, as each wave of tariffs affected additional countries and products, and increased substantially after the imposition of the wave 6 tariffs on $200 billion dollars of Chinese exports."

Amiti, Redding and Weinstein found that while losses were accumulating at a rate of $1.4 billion per month by last November, total losses from January 2018 through November 2018 ballooned to a conservative estimate of $6.9 billion.

That number may be too low, the economists said, because their model assumes that the U.S. government uses tariff tax revenues to offset the welfare burden. If the U.S. government did not offset the cost of the tariffs to the American consumer with the new tax revenues, the full value of the tariff payments would be $12.3 billion.

The White House imposed a variety tariffs on goods imported from economic partners of the U.S. in 2018. The tit-for-tat between the U.S. and China has come as Trump and the U.S. Trade Representative try to protect American intellectual property and curb a steep trade deficit.

Trump has had varying success with the tariff tactic, winning both a revised version of the North American Free Trade Agreement as well as alienating key allies including Canada and the European Union. The White House announced a round of tariffs on $200 billion of products imported from China at a 10 percent rate last year.

The White House also announced last year the introduction of a 20 percent tariff on the first 1.2 million imported large residential washing machines from South Korea in the first year and a 50 percent tariff on machines above that number. LG Electronics told retailers less than one week after that decision that it would hike prices thanks to Trump's protective policy.

Less variety

The research team also found that American consumers are also harmed during a trade war in terms of the variety of goods they can purchase. Consumers benefit from open trade and the ability to purchase more unique goods — like French wine and Colombian coffee, for example — that might be foregone if trade barriers are high.

In the three years prior to the imposition of tariffs, all categories of goods experienced increases in the number of varieties offered in the U.S., the researchers said.

"However, the imposition of the tariffs is associated with sharp drops in the number of imported varieties entering the U.S. in all sectors except the wave 1 products (washing machines and solar panels)," they wrote.

"These results suggest that some of the tariffs were prohibitive, reducing imports to zero. This can create a measurement problem that can arise if we try to assess the price impacts of tariffs on goods that are no longer imported."

The trade war also caused "dramatic" turmoil in supply chains, as about $165 billion of trade ($136 billion of imports and $29 of exports) is lost or redirected through company and customer efforts to circumvent tariffs.

"We find that the U.S. tariffs were almost completely passed through into U.S. domestic prices, so that the entire incidence of the tariffs fell on domestic consumers and importers up to now, with no impact so far on the prices received by foreign exporters," the Fed, Princeton and Columbia economists wrote. "We also find that U.S. producers responded to reduced import competition by raising their prices."

Sunday, March 24, 2019

How investors should play the race for Mindtree


The race for owning Mindtree has heated up. Media reports suggest that VG Siddhartha, one of the large non-promoter shareholders who along with his group companies own about 20.4 percent of Mindtree, wants to monetise his investments. The likely buyer is rival IT company L&T Infotech (LTI).

Should the deal go through and it results in a change in control, a mandatory open offer, whereby LTI acquires 51 percent stake, remains a possibility. Media reports also suggest interest from private equity firms, a probable white knight at the behest of the promoters or even a buyback to appease shareholders.

While it is speculative to comment on who will finally end up buying the stake of Siddhartha, the battle for Mindtree is good news for minority shareholders. Mindtree is obviously a highly sought after company which has carved out a niche for itself in new technology areas with its early adoption of digital tech that is beginning to yield rich dividends now. The world has been closely following the success story and many (including rivals) want to be a part of this journey now.

What if the buyer is LTI?

While the contours of the deal are not known, what would be critical would be the approach of the founders -- whether they exit and handover complete control to the LTI management.

related news Finalizing software upgrade, revising pilot training for 737 Max, says Boeing IOC hopes to restart fire-hit CDU at Panipat plant in 2-3 days Subroto Bagchi quits govt job, back at Mindtree to fend off L&T hostile takeover

Mindtree's founders Krishnakumar Natarajan, NS Parthasarathy, Rostow Ravanan and Subroto Bagchi hold 3.72 percent, 1.43 percent, 0.71 percent and 3.1 percent stake, respectively, and were opposed to the idea of ceding control.

At the rumoured price of Rs 981 per share, the value of  Siddhartha's stake amounts to Rs 3,288 crore. However, if there is a change in control and LTI ends up acquiring close to 51 percent of Mindtree, whereby the latter becomes a subsidiary, the cost of this acquisition might rise to Rs 8,205 crore.

As on December 2018, LTI had cash and liquid investments of close to Rs 2,032.8 crore. We do not see any reason why a rival like LTI would like to remain a passive investor in Mindtree. Hence, it is not unreasonable to assume that should this deal goes through, LTI is likely to acquire a controlling stake of 51 percent.

Given the balance sheet strength of LTI (net worth Rs 4387 crore), the exact nature of financing the acquisition (the vehicle through which the stake is acquired, the nature of the leverage) would largely dictate whether the acquisition is value accretive from the start for LTI shareholders. By controlling 51 percent of Mindtree, without assuming any synergistic benefits, LTI will have access to Rs 460 crore of profit in FY20. If the total interest cost that LTI has to bear is less, then the acquisition stands to be value accretive from inception.

Synergy gains

Over the medium to long term, synergistic gains will flow through. First and foremost it helps the business of LTI to scale up. On the basis of nine month FY19 financials, the combined revenue of LTI and Mindtree would be close to $1.7 billion, the sixth largest in the industry.

mindtree1

Source: Company

Their geographical presence is similar with 73.4 percent of revenue accruing from the US and 18.7 percent from Europe for Mindtree, not very different from LTI's which earns close to 67 percent from the US and 17 percent from Europe.

In terms of verticals, however, LTI has a lot to gain as Mindtree has a strong presence in technology, media and services (close to 40 percent) where the rate of growth of digital adoption is very high. The other verticals where Mindtree has a strong footprint are retail and consumer packaged goods (CPG) and travel and hospitality – industries that are at the forefront of digital adoption. In fact, the share of digital in total business for Mindtree is much higher at 49.5 percent compared to 37 percent for LTI.

mindtree2

Source: Company

Incidentally, Mindtree's revenue per employee (thanks to the higher value added in digital) is a tad higher than LTI.

However, LTI has been reporting a much better operating margin of close to 20 percent compared to 15 percent for Mindtree. While for LTI this has come with a record high utilisation rate of 82 percent (compared to 74.6 percent for Mindtree), we feel the synergistic benefits, coupled with the sharper focus of LTI management, can lead to improvement in Mindtree's margin performance.

The client concentration matrix of both the companies is similar with close to 33 percent of revenue accruing from the top five clients.

mindtree3

Source: Company

In the past three months, LTI has underperformed while Mindtree has outperformed, riding on better result and rumours of this stake transfer.

mindtree4

Source: Moneycontrol Research

Unless the contours of the transaction makes it value accretive for LTI shareholders, we expect LTI's underperformance to continue in the near term. Investors keen on participating in this theme should do it through Mindtree.

We are not very upbeat about the probability of buyback thwarting a hostile takeover as the quantum of such buyback would be very limited.

Disclaimer: Moneycontrol Research analysts do not hold positions in the companies discussed here First Published on Mar 18, 2019 09:35 am

Saturday, March 16, 2019

The 2 Best Biotech Stocks to Buy Now

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biotech companies are known for their potential to break out when a new drug comes to market, and today we're giving you two of the best biotech stocks to buy now.

Now that the bull market is over a decade old and valuations are near all-time highs, investors need more than an index fund to net a solid return. And buying the top biotech stocks offers the sort of upside that's so hard to find right now.

biotech

In order to find the best biotech stocks, we've turned to the Money Morning Stock VQScore™.

The VQScore system is our proprietary stock-ranking algorithm that helps us separate the wheat from the chaff. The VQScore finds only the 1,500 most profitable companies trading on the major American exchanges and then ranks them based on their growth potential.

Today, we've screened the biotech industry in the VQScore system to uncover our top biotech stocks to buy right now.

Best Biotech Stocks to Buy Now, No. 2

Biogen Inc. (NASDAQ: BIIB) is a Massachusetts-based company that focuses on discovering, developing, manufacturing, and delivering therapies for neurodegenerative and neurological diseases worldwide.

The company offers four major drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). It also has drugs for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, spinal muscular atrophy, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and pemphigus vulgaris.

5G Is Coming: The Tech Breakthrough of the Century Could Rest on This $6 Stock – Get All the Details Here

Biogen is also involved in the development of drugs to treat dementia and Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, chronic pain, and other neuromuscular disorders.

Company execs had promised to diversify its pipeline and make good this with a new acquisition. On March 4, Biogen announced that it would buy Nightstar Therapeutics Plc., a gene therapy developer, in a deal worth $877 million.

This new deal gives the company access to more later-stage assets. Specifically, Nightstar makes a gene therapy for choroideremia, an inherited and rare eye disease that can lead to blindness. It also has several gene therapies in its pipeline that are focused on treating rare eye disorders.

The company has beat earnings estimates over the past four consecutive quarters and is expected to make $28.67 per share this year. This represents 10% growth over the $26.24 EPS in 2018.

While some Wall Street analysts predict an earnings recession in 2019, this isn't a prediction for Biogen.

Growth is expected in both sales and revenue this year.

If history repeats itself and earnings bypass expectations, Biogen shares could soar past their 52-week high of $350 per share. Right now, you can pick up shares for about $319.

Currently, investors can get this stock for just 11 times expected earnings this year, which is exceptionally cheap. Plus, the company has committed to a $3.5 billion stock buyback, which is nearly 5% of its market cap.

Analysts predict shares of Biogen could soar 43% higher to $455 in the next 12 months.

But our top biotech stock to buy right now could soar even higher.

Join the conversation. Click here to jump to comments…

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Best Low Price Stocks To Invest In Right Now

tags:NYNY,BAYRY,AEO,BRKR,BGG,

They say that big things come in small packages, and sometimes the same can be said about stock prices. There are plenty of stocks trading in the single digits, and while most of them -- let's face it -- are there for a reason, risk-tolerant investors can sometimes find some real gems among low-priced equities. 

Sirius XM Holdings (NASDAQ:SIRI), Glu Mobile (NASDAQ:GLUU), Fitbit (NYSE:FIT), GoPro (NASDAQ:GPRO), Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA), Rite Aid (NYSE:RAD), and Groupon (NASDAQ:GRPN) are some of the big names with low prices that I'm watching these days. Let's take a closer look at these seven stocks trading for $7 or less. 

Image source: Sirius XM Holdings.

1. Sirius XM Holdings -- $6.94

Not every stock trading in the single digits is a loser. Sirius XM stock has been a nearly 140-bagger since bottoming out at a nickel in 2009. The satellite radio provider has been a beast over the years. The shares are trading higher for the 10th year in a row. 

Best Low Price Stocks To Invest In Right Now: Empire Resorts Inc.(NYNY)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Wendys (NASDAQ: WEN) and Empire Resorts (NASDAQ:NYNY) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Simplicity Esports and Gaming (NASDAQ:WINR) and Empire Resorts (NASDAQ:NYNY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Best Low Price Stocks To Invest In Right Now: Bayer Aktiengesellschaft (BAYRY)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Simon Erickson]

    That means they're actually printing the base pairs of DNA -- arranged in the proper sequence -- to synthetically create living things. One example is their recent joint venture with Bayer (NASDAQOTH:BAYRY) to engineer microbiome enzymes for soil, which is helping crops better absorb fertilizer nutrients and produce a better yield.

  • [By ]

    Major competitive vendors that are developing treatments for pericarditis include:

    Pfizer Inc. (PFE) Abbvie, Inc. (ABBV) XBiotech Inc. (XBIT) Handok AstraZeneca (AZN) Bayer AG (OTCPK:BAYRY) Reckitt Benckiser Group plc. (RB) PerkinElmer, Inc. (PKI) FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation (OTCPK:FUJIY) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (MRK) ALLERGAN (AGN)

    Concerning competitive advantage, management of the company is not aware of any therapies currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of recurrent pericarditis, the firm's lead indication for rilonacept.

  • [By Maxx Chatsko]

    The explosion of digital agriculture tools, which marry predictive analytics with data science to make farmers more resilient to the whims of Mother Nature, has been delivered by companies across the agricultural value chain. Seed and chemical companies such as DowDuPont (NYSE:DWDP) and Bayer (NASDAQOTH:BAYRY) have plowed billions into the agtech markets. The world's largest fertilizer company, Nutrien (NYSE:NTR), has even joined the fray. There are more start-ups than can be counted.

Best Low Price Stocks To Invest In Right Now: American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.(AEO)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Hennessy Advisors Inc. bought a new stake in American Eagle Outfitters (NYSE:AEO) in the third quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm bought 1,049,261 shares of the apparel retailer’s stock, valued at approximately $26,053,000. Hennessy Advisors Inc. owned approximately 0.59% of American Eagle Outfitters at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Systematic Financial Management LP grew its position in American Eagle Outfitters (NYSE:AEO) by 3.6% during the 2nd quarter, HoldingsChannel reports. The firm owned 1,229,469 shares of the apparel retailer’s stock after acquiring an additional 42,263 shares during the quarter. American Eagle Outfitters makes up approximately 0.7% of Systematic Financial Management LP’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 16th biggest position. Systematic Financial Management LP’s holdings in American Eagle Outfitters were worth $28,585,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Chris Lange]

    American Eagle Outfitters Inc. (NYSE: AEO) also is scheduled to release its most recent quarterly results Thursday. The consensus forecast calls for $0.44 in EPS and $1.21 billion in revenue. Shares closed at $20.27. The consensus price target is $19.31, and the 52-week range is $10.23 to $20.46.

  • [By Dan Caplinger]

    Wall Street had another summer celebration on Wednesday, as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite once again set records. Most investors attributed the gains to a 4.2% rise in gross domestic product during the second quarter, which was slightly faster than the initial estimate on GDP had suggested last month. Yet even with a favorable attitude prevailing throughout most of the market, some stocks suffered setbacks. Movado Group (NYSE:MOV), Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU), and American Eagle Outfitters (NYSE:AEO) were among the worst performers on the day. Here's why they did so poorly.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on American Eagle Outfitters (AEO)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Demitrios Kalogeropoulos]

    Investors weren't thrilled with American Eagle's (NYSE:AEO) second-quarter earnings report, sending the stock lower immediately following the results. Yet that dip likely had more to do with the dramatic run-up that shares have had so far this year, and not with any looming issues with the company.

Best Low Price Stocks To Invest In Right Now: Bruker Corporation(BRKR)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Bruker Co. (NASDAQ:BRKR) – Jefferies Financial Group lowered their Q1 2019 earnings per share (EPS) estimates for Bruker in a research report issued on Tuesday, February 12th. Jefferies Financial Group analyst B. Couillard now expects that the medical research company will earn $0.24 per share for the quarter, down from their previous forecast of $0.28. Jefferies Financial Group also issued estimates for Bruker’s Q3 2019 earnings at $0.42 EPS, Q4 2019 earnings at $0.60 EPS, FY2019 earnings at $1.58 EPS and FY2020 earnings at $1.75 EPS.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Shares of Bruker Co. (NASDAQ:BRKR) have received a consensus rating of “Hold” from the twelve brokerages that are presently covering the company, MarketBeat reports. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell recommendation, seven have given a hold recommendation and three have issued a buy recommendation on the company. The average 12-month price target among brokerages that have covered the stock in the last year is $33.11.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Bruker (BRKR)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Here are some of the media stories that may have effected Accern’s rankings:

    Get Bruker alerts: Bruker Announces Improved Solutions for Microbial Strain Typing, Hospital Hygiene and Infection Control, and Candida auris Testing at ASM 2018 (finance.yahoo.com) Financial Review: Bruker (BRKR) versus Pacific Biosciences of California (PACB) (americanbankingnews.com) Global Microbiology Testing/Clinical Microbiology Market 2018-2024: Market is Influenced by Biomerieux, Abbott, Roche, Bruker and Bio-rad Labs (bizjournals.com) Bruker Corporation appoints Gerald Herman as CFO (seekingalpha.com) Bruker Corporation Appoints Gerald Herman as Chief Financial Officer (finance.yahoo.com)

    A number of brokerages have issued reports on BRKR. Zacks Investment Research cut Bruker from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Friday. BTIG Research set a $42.00 target price on Bruker and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Sunday, May 6th. BidaskClub raised Bruker from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, May 23rd. Bank of America decreased their target price on Bruker from $37.00 to $34.00 and set a “neutral” rating for the company in a research report on Friday, May 4th. Finally, Leerink Swann upped their target price on Bruker from $32.00 to $34.00 and gave the stock a “market perform” rating in a research report on Friday, February 9th. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, ten have assigned a hold rating and one has given a buy rating to the company. The company presently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus price target of $32.91.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Bruker Co. (NASDAQ:BRKR) has received an average recommendation of “Hold” from the eleven brokerages that are currently covering the company, Marketbeat.com reports. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, eight have assigned a hold rating and one has given a buy rating to the company. The average twelve-month price target among brokers that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is $34.38.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Bruker (BRKR)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Best Low Price Stocks To Invest In Right Now: Briggs & Stratton Corporation(BGG)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By ]

    For his "Executive Decision" segment, Cramer spoke with Todd Teske, chairman, president and CEO of Briggs & Stratton (BGG) , the small-engine maker that posted a penny-a-share earnings beat on Wednesday, but saw shares fall 11% on lighter-than-expected revenues and a cut in the company's full-year guidance.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Briggs & Stratton (BGG)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Check out these big penny stock gainers and losers

    Losers Check-Cap Ltd. (NASDAQ: CHEK) fell 23.3 percent to $9.87 in pre-market trading after declining 13.45 percent on Wednesday. SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: SXCP) fell 12.8 percent to $16.00 in pre-market trading after reporting Q1 results. Briggs & Stratton Corporation (NYSE: BGG) fell 11 percent to $17.55 in pre-market trading after the company posted mixed Q3 results and lowered its FY18 guidance. New Gold Inc. (NYSE: NGD) fell 8.4 percent to $2.30 in pre-market trading following downbeat Q1 results. Quality Care Properties, Inc. (NYSE: QCP) fell 8.2 percent to $20.85 in pre-market trading. Welltower announced plans to acquire QCP for $20.75 per share in cash. China Customer Relations Centers Inc. (NASDAQ: CCRC) shares fell 7.5 percent to $17.25 in pre-market trading after climbing 18.73 percent on Wednesday. Nokia Corporation (NYSE: NOK) shares fell 5.7 percent to $5.58 in pre-market trading after reporting Q1 results. eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY) fell 5.6 percent to $38.66 in pre-market trading following Q1 results. Southw
  • [By Garrett Baldwin]

    By submitting your email address you will receive a free subscription to Profit Alerts and occasional special offers from Money Map Press and our affiliates. You can unsubscribe at anytime and we encourage you to read more about our privacy policy.

    Three Stocks to Watch Today: CSCO, M, BLK The earnings report calendar is headlined today by Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO). The tech giant will report fiscal fourth-quarter earnings after the bell. Wall Street expects that the firm will report earnings per share (EPS) of $0.69 on top of $12.77 billion in revenue. Shares of Macy's Inc. (NYSE: M) are on the move after the company reported earnings before the bell. The iconic retailer reported adjusted EPS of $0.70 on top of $5.57 billion in revenue. Wall Street had expected EPS of $0.49 on top of $5.61 billion in revenue. Shares of Macy's stock were off 5.3% in premarket hours. George Soros' firm Soros Fund Management increased its stake in shares of Blackrock Inc. (NYSE: BLK) by a whopping 60% in the second quarter, according to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing. If you were using Money Morning's proprietary Stock VQScore™, you'd have known that Blackrock was sitting in the "Buy Zone" before the SEC filing was made public. The global asset manager has a perfect 4.75 score, and it will look to blast off now that other investors start to follow Soros and other institutional investors that love this stock. To learn more about the Money Morning Stock VQScore, go here right now. Look for additional earnings reports from NetApp Inc. (Nasdaq: NTAP), MSG Networks Inc. (NYSE: MSGN), CACI International Inc. (NYSE: CACI), Briggs & Stratton Corp. (NYSE: BGG), SpartanNash Co. (Nasdaq: SPTN), and Luxoft Holding Inc. (NYSE: LXFT).

    Follow Money Morning on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

  • [By Jon C. Ogg]

    Generac Holdings Inc. (NYSE: GNRC) was up less than 1% at $59.20 late on Tuesday, but that is actually up by over 6% from last Friday’s close for the generator maker before the storm threat was so imminent. Briggs & Stratton Corp. (NYSE: BGG) is also in that field and its gain of just 0.3% to $20.45 late on Tuesday was actually up only about 1% from last Friday as the company is more diversified

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Ideas for Profit: Here's what investors can expect after Arvind's demerger


Highlights:

- Anup Engineering and Arvind Fashions are anticipated to trade at premium valuations in due course
- For Arvind Ltd, re-rating will be predominantly driven by earnings traction
- The demerger will help unlock value once Arvind Fashion's valuation reflects the true potential of the business

--------------------------------------------------

Arvind Ltd, the textile major, first announced a plan to demerge the engineering and branded apparel divisions on November 8, 2017. After SEBI's approval, the demerger was finally effected on November 28, 2018.

While Anup Engineering got listed on the exchange on 1 March, 2019, Arvind Fashions got listed on March 8, 2019.

related news WPP appoints Microsoft UK CEO Cindy Rose to board Vidhi Specialty: Beneficiary of strong entry barriers in food colour industry

The core objective behind the exercise was to unlock value in each of the three verticals. Consequently, cash flows and profits from a particular segment would be utilised to fund growth strategies of the respective segment only.

Image 1

A glance at the exhibit suggests that Arvind Fashions was incorrectly quoting at the exchanges ie. at a steep discount to its fair value on the first day of its listing (March 8, 2019). Therefore, Arvind Fashions is expected to continue its price rally till the fair value (in our view, this will be somewhere in the range of Rs 900 – 1,000) is discovered by the Street. It remains to be seen how markets value this coveted business from Arvind Ltd's stable.

Notwithstanding the glitch, here's a glance at how the 3 businesses are shaping up:-

Arvind Ltd (excluding Anup Engineering and Arvind Fashions)

Arvind Ltd's stock price post-demerger (ie. from November 28, 2018 onwards) hasn't had a good run. Besides market volatlity and weak Q3 numbers, here are a few concerns in the minds of investors that possibly hindered the stock's upmove:-

- High capex investments in relation to expansion of garmenting facilities
- Steep raw material (cotton) costs that may lead to margin pressure

- Overcapacity in denim fabrics, thus resulting in lower utilisation rates

Despite the above-mentioned challenges, the possibility of the stock re-rating in the long-term cannot be ignored if there is a sustainable revival in earnings. This, in turn, would depend on the following:-

- Introduction of value-added products in advanced materials (ie. technical textiles)
- Foray into manufacturing activewear and athleisure fabrics and garments

- Increased in-house captive consumption of fabrics for manufacturing apparel

Anup Engineering

Investors have been pretty bullish about the prospects of Anup Engineering because its products are pretty niche and high-margin in nature.

Image 2

Besides being the third largest heavy fabrication player in India, the company caters to clients across specialised sectors such as petrochemicals, oil and gas, fertilisers and power.

Its financials are healthy too.

Image 3

If Anup Engineering continues to deliver high RoCEs (return on capital employed) and generate positive free cash flows (as seen in the past) sustainably, it will command premium valuations.

Most stocks in the capital goods space have been plagued with issues such as highly leveraged balance sheets, a weak demand environment and input cost hikes, among others. So, any outperformance by Anup Engineering compared to its peers will, almost certainly, result in a big price upside.

Arvind Fashions

Arvind Fashions has shown consistent improvement in its margins since the past few quarters. This, coupled with a strong portfolio of brands and promising potential of Indian retail, caught the attention of investors. Going forward, here are the factors that will influence the company's performance:-

- Store additions in brands and speciality retail
- Accelerated foray into leisurewear
- Operating leverage from power brands

- Economies of scale and strong private label brands in 'Unlimited', the affordable fashion format

Is there any value proposition in store?

For investors that held shares of Arvind Ltd pre-demerger and continue to hold them now as well (ie. after the 3 businesses are separately listed), Arvind Fashions will continue with its price upmove in the near-term till it reaches its fair value. In times to come, it should contribute the most in terms of shareholders' value creation.

While Anup Engineering's historical positives are already discounted in the stock's price, Arvind Ltd will have to prove its mettle convincingly.

Follow @krishnakarwa152

For more research articles, visit our Moneycontrol Research page

(Disclaimer: Moneycontrol Research analysts do not hold positions in the companies discussed here) First Published on Mar 12, 2019 01:38 pm

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Microchip Technology Inc. (MCHP) Receives Consensus Recommendation of “Buy” from Analyst

Microchip Technology Inc. (NASDAQ:MCHP) has earned an average recommendation of “Buy” from the twenty-one brokerages that are covering the firm, MarketBeat.com reports. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell recommendation, seven have assigned a hold recommendation and twelve have issued a buy recommendation on the company. The average 1 year price target among brokers that have updated their coverage on the stock in the last year is $102.75.

A number of equities analysts have recently issued reports on the stock. BidaskClub raised shares of Microchip Technology from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Friday, November 16th. Cowen assumed coverage on shares of Microchip Technology in a research report on Friday, February 22nd. They set a “market perform” rating and a $90.00 price objective on the stock. BMO Capital Markets assumed coverage on shares of Microchip Technology in a research report on Monday, November 12th. They set an “outperform” rating and a $92.00 price objective on the stock. Citigroup reissued a “buy” rating and set a $105.00 price objective on shares of Microchip Technology in a research report on Thursday, February 7th. Finally, Zacks Investment Research raised shares of Microchip Technology from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Monday, December 10th.

Get Microchip Technology alerts:

Microchip Technology stock traded up $0.60 during trading hours on Friday, reaching $85.05. 1,802,323 shares of the company’s stock were exchanged, compared to its average volume of 3,054,305. The company has a current ratio of 2.92, a quick ratio of 1.83 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.04. Microchip Technology has a twelve month low of $60.70 and a twelve month high of $104.20. The company has a market cap of $20.15 billion, a P/E ratio of 16.39, a PEG ratio of 1.13 and a beta of 1.21.

Microchip Technology (NASDAQ:MCHP) last released its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, February 5th. The semiconductor company reported $1.66 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $1.45 by $0.21. The company had revenue of $1.42 billion for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $1.40 billion. Microchip Technology had a net margin of 6.53% and a return on equity of 32.30%. The business’s revenue was up 42.5% on a year-over-year basis. During the same quarter in the prior year, the firm earned $1.36 EPS. Equities research analysts forecast that Microchip Technology will post 5.89 EPS for the current fiscal year.

The firm also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Thursday, March 7th. Investors of record on Thursday, February 21st were given a $0.365 dividend. This is a boost from Microchip Technology’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.36. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Wednesday, February 20th. This represents a $1.46 annualized dividend and a yield of 1.72%. Microchip Technology’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 28.13%.

In related news, Director Matthew W. Chapman sold 4,660 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, February 15th. The shares were sold at an average price of $91.04, for a total value of $424,246.40. Following the transaction, the director now owns 19,080 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $1,737,043.20. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available through this hyperlink. Also, VP Mitchell R. Little sold 3,585 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, February 13th. The shares were sold at an average price of $91.17, for a total transaction of $326,844.45. Following the completion of the transaction, the vice president now directly owns 7,693 shares in the company, valued at approximately $701,370.81. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. In the last ninety days, insiders sold 10,601 shares of company stock worth $961,340. 2.13% of the stock is owned by insiders.

A number of hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently made changes to their positions in MCHP. Clarfeld Financial Advisors LLC purchased a new stake in Microchip Technology in the 4th quarter valued at about $26,000. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund increased its stake in Microchip Technology by 7,043.2% in the 4th quarter. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund now owns 1,841,512 shares of the semiconductor company’s stock valued at $26,000 after buying an additional 1,815,732 shares during the last quarter. Morgan Dempsey Capital Management LLC purchased a new stake in Microchip Technology in the 4th quarter valued at about $28,000. Lindbrook Capital LLC purchased a new stake in Microchip Technology in the 4th quarter valued at about $32,000. Finally, Enlightenment Research LLC purchased a new stake in Microchip Technology in the 4th quarter valued at about $43,000.

Microchip Technology Company Profile

Microchip Technology Incorporated develops, manufactures, and sells semiconductor products for various embedded control applications. The company offers general purpose and specialized 8-bit, 16-bit, and 32-bit microcontrollers; 32-bit microprocessors; and microcontrollers for automotive networking, computing, lighting, power supplies, motor control, human machine interface, security, wired connectivity, and wireless connectivity.

See Also: Inflation

Analyst Recommendations for Microchip Technology (NASDAQ:MCHP)

Monday, March 11, 2019

NantHealth (NH) Sees Large Volume Increase

NantHealth Inc (NASDAQ:NH) shares saw strong trading volume on Friday . 6,118,098 shares traded hands during trading, an increase of 1,566% from the previous session’s volume of 367,215 shares.The stock last traded at $1.19 and had previously closed at $1.08.

Separately, Zacks Investment Research upgraded shares of NantHealth from a “strong sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Wednesday, January 30th. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, two have issued a hold rating and three have issued a buy rating to the company. The company presently has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus price target of $4.08.

Get NantHealth alerts:

The company has a market cap of $147.07 million, a P/E ratio of -1.06 and a beta of 0.86. The company has a current ratio of 1.24, a quick ratio of 1.23 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.89.

Hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in the business. SG Americas Securities LLC acquired a new stake in NantHealth in the fourth quarter valued at $29,000. Paloma Partners Management Co acquired a new stake in NantHealth in the fourth quarter valued at $31,000. Vanguard Group Inc lifted its stake in NantHealth by 2.3% in the third quarter. Vanguard Group Inc now owns 646,248 shares of the company’s stock valued at $1,015,000 after acquiring an additional 14,515 shares during the last quarter. Finally, BlackRock Inc. lifted its stake in NantHealth by 1.5% in the third quarter. BlackRock Inc. now owns 2,373,118 shares of the company’s stock valued at $3,725,000 after acquiring an additional 35,869 shares during the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 4.42% of the company’s stock.

TRADEMARK VIOLATION NOTICE: “NantHealth (NH) Sees Large Volume Increase” was posted by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this piece on another website, it was illegally stolen and republished in violation of U.S. and international trademark and copyright law. The correct version of this piece can be read at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4207535/nanthealth-nh-sees-large-volume-increase.html.

NantHealth Company Profile (NASDAQ:NH)

NantHealth, Inc, together with its subsidiaries, operates as an evidence-based personalized healthcare company in the United States and internationally. The company engages in converging science and technology through an integrated clinical platform to provide health information at the point of care.

See Also: Fundamental Analysis and Choosing Stocks

Sunday, March 10, 2019

Citigroup Inc. Raises Position in Amdocs Limited (DOX)

Citigroup Inc. boosted its position in shares of Amdocs Limited (NASDAQ:DOX) by 0.8% during the 4th quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The fund owned 86,236 shares of the technology company’s stock after buying an additional 695 shares during the quarter. Citigroup Inc.’s holdings in Amdocs were worth $5,052,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.

A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds have also recently modified their holdings of DOX. Riverview Trust Co acquired a new position in Amdocs during the 4th quarter worth $27,000. Cutler Group LP acquired a new position in Amdocs during the 4th quarter worth $55,000. Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc. acquired a new position in Amdocs during the 4th quarter worth $58,000. Honkamp Krueger Financial Services Inc. acquired a new position in Amdocs during the 3rd quarter worth $124,000. Finally, Campbell & CO Investment Adviser LLC acquired a new position in Amdocs during the 4th quarter worth $222,000. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 91.10% of the company’s stock.

Get Amdocs alerts:

DOX stock opened at $54.21 on Friday. The firm has a market capitalization of $7.93 billion, a PE ratio of 15.53, a P/E/G ratio of 1.70 and a beta of 0.53. Amdocs Limited has a twelve month low of $52.60 and a twelve month high of $71.72.

Amdocs (NASDAQ:DOX) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, February 5th. The technology company reported $0.98 earnings per share for the quarter, missing the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $0.99 by ($0.01). The company had revenue of $1.01 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $1.01 billion. Amdocs had a net margin of 8.46% and a return on equity of 14.75%. The business’s revenue for the quarter was up 3.5% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same period last year, the company earned $1.06 EPS. Sell-side analysts forecast that Amdocs Limited will post 3.92 earnings per share for the current year.

The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, April 19th. Stockholders of record on Friday, March 29th will be paid a $0.285 dividend. The ex-dividend date is Thursday, March 28th. This represents a $1.14 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 2.10%. This is an increase from Amdocs’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.25. Amdocs’s dividend payout ratio is 26.74%.

Several research analysts have issued reports on DOX shares. TheStreet downgraded Amdocs from a “b” rating to a “c+” rating in a report on Friday, November 9th. Zacks Investment Research downgraded Amdocs from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a report on Monday, November 19th. BidaskClub downgraded Amdocs from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Wednesday, November 28th. JPMorgan Chase & Co. set a $70.00 price objective on Amdocs and gave the stock a “hold” rating in a report on Tuesday, December 11th. Finally, ValuEngine downgraded Amdocs from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a report on Friday, February 15th. Two analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, four have given a hold rating and two have assigned a buy rating to the company. The stock presently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $71.03.

TRADEMARK VIOLATION WARNING: “Citigroup Inc. Raises Position in Amdocs Limited (DOX)” was originally published by Ticker Report and is the sole property of of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this piece on another publication, it was illegally stolen and reposted in violation of international copyright legislation. The original version of this piece can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4205662/citigroup-inc-raises-position-in-amdocs-limited-dox.html.

Amdocs Profile

Amdocs Limited, through its subsidiaries, provides software and services to the communications, pay TV, entertainment, and media industry service providers worldwide. The company offers amdocsONE a line of services designed for various stages of a service provider's lifecycle, including planning, delivery, implementation, and ongoing support, as well as consumer experience and monetization, media and digital, enterprise and connected society, service-driven network, and services and agile operation solutions.

Featured Story: How to Invest in the Dividend Aristocrat Index

Want to see what other hedge funds are holding DOX? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Amdocs Limited (NASDAQ:DOX).

Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Amdocs (NASDAQ:DOX)

Saturday, March 9, 2019

DXP Enterprises Inc (DXPE) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

DXP Enterprises Inc  (NASDAQ:DXPE)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallMarch 07, 2019, 5:00 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good afternoon. My name is Kelly and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the DXPE Enterprises' Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2018 Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the prepared remarks, there will be a question-

and-answer session. (Operator Instructions).

Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Kent Yee, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead, sir.

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Kelly. This is Kent Yee and welcome to DXPE's Q4 2018 conference call discuss our results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. Joining me today is our Chairman and CEO, David Little.

Before we get started, I want to remind you that today's call is being webcast and recorded and includes forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. A detailed discussion of the many factors that we believe may have a material effect on our business on an ongoing basis are contained in our SEC filings, but DXPE assumes no obligation to update that information as a result of new information or future events. During this call, we may present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures, a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in our earnings press release. The press release and an accompanying Investor presentation are now available on our web site at ir.dxpe.com.

I will now turn the call move to David to provide his thoughts and a summary of fiscal 2018 and fourth quarter results.

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks Kent, and thanks to everyone on our 2018 fourth quarter and year-end conference call. DXPE started 2018 with some very lofty goals and coined the term smart recovery. Internally, this described our objective to grow the top line 20% and the bottom line 100%. We accomplished both goals. Congratulations to all our stakeholders and a special thank you to our DX people, you can trust.

Customers can trust DXP to be fast, convenient, and technical. Experts with whom our customers enjoy doing business with, DX people, they like and trust. Thank you, DXP's sales professionals. Thank you, DXPE operations for making our sales professionals look good. Also thank you to corporate support, one team making the customer happy. Thanks DX people for an awesome year and our future looks bright.

Our smart recovery plan for 2018 included organic growth strategies for both local, regional and national accounts. Such as, tech program for finding new accounts. BMI to make the point of sale faster. Selling pumps through our bearing MPT channel, and custom API pumps sold through our global and national relationships. IPS expanded our efforts to sell measurement equipment and better communicate around leveraging local plants into multiple plants or corporate accounts. Supply Chain Services continues to add new customers and new sites for existing customers. We have a suite of smart programs to expand value-added services and technology to existing sites.

Canada's rotating equipment is in a tough market. Yet, they had a great year taking market share from the competition. Congratulations. Pump Works, aftermarket, remanufacturing, all had great success selling their products and services through DXP's sales channel. Quality products, Made in America and a faster supply chain, gives us tremendous success.

IT, accounting, inventory management, are all working hard to support DXP's sales organization and manage our return on invested capital, which has been a success versus our peer group. Working capital is only 16.8% of sales, which is truly outstanding. Our integration team is ready for our acquisition strategy. HR is working hard to keep up with the growth of DX people. We started the year with 2,511 DX people and ended with 2,740.

Innovative Pumping Solutions started 2018 with planned growth strategies of new products, increased fabrication space, applications specialists, service and repair with increased engineering and fabrication support. All of these actions and strategies resulted in a terrific 2018.

Our fourth quarter results rounded out a tremendous 2018 for DXP. During the year, strong sales growth and the EBITDA expansion delivered triple-digit diluted earnings-per-share growth and strong free cash flow. DXP delivered 16.1% organic sales growth for the full year, accompanied by a $47.5 million sales contribution from the closing of an acquisition of ASI at the beginning of 2018. This translated into a 20.8% sales growth year-over-year. DX people continue to provide 100% effort and do a day's work in a day, driving stakeholder success and value creation.

We generated $29.1 million of free cash flow in 2018, which is a significant improvement over fiscal 2017. This will help position us for significant capital deployment going forward.

As we look at our financial performance DXP has now experienced nine quarters of sequential increases in quarterly total days per business day. We continue to remain on track for gross margin improvement that we outlined during Q3 of 2017. Our results year-over-year have been consistent with our expectations and in line with our financial goals to grow 20% year-over-year, through a combination of organic sales and acquisition growth.

We believe, we continue to take market share in many of our businesses, driven by our focus on being fast, convenient and technical for our customers and all stakeholders. DX people, you can trust.

As it pertains to the operating environment, the ISM, PMI manufacturing indexes averaged 58.8% during 2018. This supports the organic sales increases we experienced during the year. The Metalworking Business Index showed strength averaging slightly less at 56.8% during fiscal 2018. These sentiment indexes remain in positive territory, but have softened in December, we remain optimistic around the industrial economic, despite the news, headlines and volatility in the financial markets.

In terms of oil and gas, US market indicators show some pull back in the fourth quarter, where WTI oil prices moved (ph) from $76 per barrel to $45 per barrel. This significant drop in price in the fourth quarter was driven partially by the US shale producers oversupplying to the upside. Additionally, geopolitical negative impact supply and demand balance sentiments. A combination of these factors, together with a large sell-off in the equity markets due to concerns around global growth and increased US interest rates, created a near-perfect storm to close out 2018. As a result, we anticipate customers will take a more cautious approach to CapEx budgets and spending levels in response to the continued volatility in the market dynamics.

Quarterly prices for Q4 were down 14% from Q3. That said, prices have been improving from our low of $44.48 per barrel through January and February and provided optimism as we move through fiscal 2019.

Turning to our results, total DXP revenue of $311 million for the fourth quarter of 2018 was a 17.1% increase year-over-year. This reflects stability, rebound, and growth in our end markets. As well as the addition of Application Specialties. This result of DXP's fiscal 2018 sales of $1.2 billion or a 20.8% increase over fiscal 2017%. 16.1% organically and $47.5 million contributed by ASI.

Innovative Pumping Solutions sales increased 43% year-over-year to $291.7 million, while Service Center sales increased 17% year-over-year to $750 million. Supply chain services sales increased 8% year-over-year to $174.5 million. Innovative Pumping Solutions sales increase was driven by modular packaged equipment for onshore markets and products sold into the midstream market.

Additionally, similar to 2017, DXP sold a meaningful amount of LACT and ACT units, HP plus pumps and other modular packages within both our configured and engineered to order business. In terms of the strength in the IPS backlog, it continued to grow through 2018. The IPS yearly average backlog increased 57.6% from 2017 to 2018, versus 39.3% growth from fiscal 2016 to 2017. The Service Center, year-over-year sales growth was primarily driven by increases in our rotating equipment and Metalworking product divisions. Within Service Centers we saw particular year-over-year sales strength in DXP's Canadian rotating equipment, Southwest, Southeast and West regions.

DXP's overall gross profit margin for the year were 27.3 % a 34 basis point improvement over 2017. Adjusting for the acquisition of ASI, gross margins were 27.7% or a 76 basis points improvement over 2017. The improvement in gross margins is in line with our communication back in Q3 of 2017 with what we expected and reflects a 116 basis point improvement from Q3 or an average of 23 basis points quarterly improvement from our tranche (ph).

We still are driving improvements in gross profit margins and look to have incremental improvement through 2019. The improvement in gross margins are a result of the combination of sales increases in the IPS segment, along with improvements in the average gross margin on capital-related projects, as well as the consistent strength and improvement in our Service Centers.

SG&A as a percent of sales declined to 196 basis points, going from 23.7% in 2017 to 21.7% in 2018. In terms of my thoughts on SG&A, SG&A will decrease as a percent of sales, and increase as expected, in dollars, reflecting our investment in our people and organization, as we focus on accelerating growth through 2019.

DXP's overall income margin was 5.6% or $68.5 million, which includes corporate expenses and amortization. This reflected a 230 basis point improvement in margins over 2017. That being said, we feel there is opportunity in our operations to be more efficient. This year we continue to benefit from the leverage we get, as SG&A growth is less than the overall sales growth within the business plus gross margin improvements.

IPS operating income margin was 11.6%. Service Center operating income margins were 10.8%, with the second half of the year showing strength with an average operating income margin of 11.3%. And Supply Chain Services' operating income margin was 9.3%.

As we mentioned during our Q3 call, Supply Chain Services experienced margin contraction during the second half of 2018, which is a result of higher than normal ramp-up costs associated with seven new sites. We expanded the seven new sites, whereby we hire the personnel, convert the customer storerooms to our standards, which causes DXP to incur upfront costs. Once we go live, revenues start. Sales along with an improvement in margins should come along with the completion of these start-up phases, which is evidenced by a 9% basis point improvement we experienced from Q3 to Q4.

Overall, DXP produced EBITDA of $95.8 million versus $61.7 million in 2017, a year-over-year increase of $34.1 million or 55.2%. EBITDA as a percent of sales was 7.9% versus 6.1% for 2017, a 175 basis point improvement.

Looking forward to 2019 in terms of oil and gas, we expect the supply and demand balance sentiment and the oil prices to improve over the course of the year, as the OPEC and Russia cuts take full effect, the dispensation from the Iran export sanctions expired and are not renewed, and as the US and China continue toward a solution to their own ongoing trade dispute. While the indices for our industrial market show below recent highs, we believe there is strength still in the market and that our domestic focus weigh favorably, should global industrial activity slow.

From customer discussions, we're seeing clear signs of oil and gas investment sentiment starting to normalize in positive undertones with our key industrial customers.

In summary, we're pleased with our overall momentum DXP delivered 20.8% sales growth through both organic and acquisition sales. This is consistent with our strategic financial goals that position us well for the fiscal year 2019. We look to continue to drive improvement in our gross margins and move closer to our historical average of 28% plus on a combined basis.

In fiscal 2018, capital allocation was focused on leveraging our inventory, investing in project work, maintaining our working capital as a percent of sales. Additionally, DXP was focused on generating cash, paying down debt, and maintaining a pristine balance sheet that would give us optionality headed into 2019 to pursue acquisitions more forcefully. With the future success -- successful execution of our strategy, we expect continued improvements for generating free cash flow and greater shareholder value.

We know that DXP has a differentiated and a compelling value proposition. DXP's sales, operations, and corporate functions remain energized and continue to work together to create value for our customers. DXP has a great team focused on producing great results for our customers, suppliers and our shareholders alike. All three business segments performed well during the year. We will drive change, innovate for growth and lead smart.

With that I will now turn it back to Kent to review the financials in more detail.

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, David, and thank you to everyone for joining us for our review of our fourth quarter and fiscal 2018 financial results. Q4 was another great quarter for DXP and allowed us to finish the year strong, while building momentum going into fiscal 2019. As David mentioned, we're growing through a combination of organic and acquisition driven sales. Our balance sheet is poised for us to be acquisitive and we look to continue the execution of that part of our strategy in 2019. Q4 2018 financial results marks our ninth consecutive quarter of increases with respect to quarterly sales per business day.

Total sales for the fourth quarter increased 17.1% year-over-year to $311 million. Adjusting for the $12.4 million Q4 sales contribution from ASI, organic sales increased 12.4%. Total DXP sales for fiscal 2018 grew 20.8%, with 16.1% coming from organic sales growth. ASI contributed $47.5 million in sales for fiscal 2018, and we're excited to have them as a part of the team. They have performed ahead of plan and they have been a positive addition to DXP.

Total sales growth for fiscal 2018 was supported by DXP's three business segments; reflecting the differentiated go-to-market strategy of each segment the opportunities available given where we are at in the cycle, and the continued expansion we're seeing from existing and new customers.

Average daily sales for the fourth quarter were $5 million per day versus $4.4 million per day in Q4 2017. Adjusting average daily sales for ASI, average daily sales for Q4 increased 10.6% versus Q4 2017. Average daily sales for fiscal 2018 were $4.8 million per day versus $4 million per day in fiscal 2017. The overall growth reflects the execution of our strategy, supported by our key end market indicators for fiscal 2018. While we experienced another round of volatility in Q4 in oil prices, we experienced overall strength throughout the year in the rig count, US oil and gas production, drilling, the Metalworking business index and the PMI.

The ISM, PMI manufacturing index averaged 58.8% for 2018, compared to 55.4% in 2017 or is essentially still up a 140 basis points compared to 2017. This supports the organic sales increases we experienced through 2018 in our non-oil and gas end markets. Additionally, the Metalworking Business Index averaged a reading of 56.9% in 2018 versus 55.5% in 2017 and supports the strength we have experienced in our Metalworking businesses.

In terms of oil and gas, average US rig count for 2018 was up 17.9% versus 2017. That said, Canada's rig count was down 7.7% from fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2018. This impacted DXP's Canadian Safety Services business on a year-over-year basis.

In terms of business segments, all three experienced sales growth year-over-year, with IPS showing the greatest improvement increasing 43%, followed by our Service Centers which experienced 17% growth and Supply Chain Services with 8% growth. Businesses within our IPS segment, which experienced year-over-year sales growth include our configured-to-order, engineered-to-order, remanufacturing businesses and our branded private label pump offering, as well as our measurement equipment business. Regions within our Service Center segment, which experienced meaningful sales growth in fiscal 2018 include the Southwest, Southeast, and West regions. Additionally, we saw a meaningful increase within our seal and Metalworking product divisions. The Metalworking product sales were supported by the strong performance from ASI.

Turning to our gross margins, DXP's total gross margins were 27.3%. Adjusting for the acquisition of ASI, gross margins were 27.7%, DXP's total gross margin for 2018 reflect the progress we continue to make, since we troughed in Q3 of 2017 and improvements reflected through 2018 in our engineered to order and our Canadian Safety Services businesses.

In terms of operating income, combined, all three business segments improved 181 basis points in year-over-year business segment operating income margins versus 2017. Total DXP operating income increased 104.4% versus 2017 to $68.5 million, IPS had the greatest uptick improving operating income margins 604 basis points to $33.9 million, followed by Service Centers, which had a 90 basis point improvement to $80.7 million. Supply Chain Services decreased 28 basis points on a year-over-year basis. This is primarily driven by a decrease in gross profit margins associated with the implementation of new SCS sites, and revenue not fully scaling, as mentioned during our Q3 conference call.

Turning to EBITDA fiscal 2018 EBITDA was $95.8 million, up 55.2% from 2017. This does include a one-time gain of $1.3 million associated with the sale of a corporate facility. Adjusting for the debt for the gain, EBITDA grew 53.1% year-over-year. Year-over-year EBITDA margins increased 175 basis points, primarily reflecting the fixed cost SG&A leverage we experience as we grow sales.

EBITDA margins for fiscal 2018 were 7.8% compared to 6.1% in fiscal 2017. Sales growth of 20.8% with only 13% SG&A growth on a year-over-year basis translated into 2.7 times operating leverage. In terms of EPS, our net income for 2018 was $35.5 million. This is up $18.7 million or 111.6% versus 2017. Our earnings per diluted share for fiscal 2018 were $1.94 versus $0.93 in fiscal 2017. Adjusting for the one-time gain, earnings per diluted share would have been $1.87, or $0.07 per share impact related to the gain.

Turning to the balance sheet, in terms of working capital, working capital increased $35 million for the prior year to $204.2 million. In Q4 we remain focused on providing the capital to support growth in our businesses. Working capital as a percentage of sales at the end of the fourth quarter was 16.8%. This is above our historical average, but reflects a 129 basis points improvement compared to Q3. While this is above our historical averages, it reflects the growth in our business and investment in project related jobs within IPS. The main drivers of the increase in working capital include cost in estimated profits and excessive billings and inventory. This has been consistent through fiscal 2018, as we have supported our core distribution business and project-related businesses.

Cost and estimated profits has increased $5.6 million from Q4 2017 to $32.5 million and inventories up $23.4 million from Q4 of 2017 to $114.8 million. This reflects DXP carrying higher levels to support our revenue growth. We achieved inventory turns of 7.8 times, down from 8.4 times a year ago. From Q3, inventory is down $1.7 million and cost and estimated profits is down $5.9 million.

In terms of cash, we had $40.5 million in cash on the balance sheet at December 31, 2018. This is an increase of $24.3 million compared to December 31, 2017. In terms of CapEx, CapEx in the fourth quarter was $1.6 million or 0.5% of fourth quarter sales. CapEx in fiscal 2018 was $9.3 million or 0.8% of sales. Compared to fiscal 2017, CapEx dollars are up $6.5 million. CapEx during fiscal 2018 reflects investments made within our IPS business segment, including the purchase of patterns for our remanufacturing business, and some smaller items including various tools and equipment. We are also making investments in software to enhance our sales efforts and our corporate operations.

Turning to free cash flow; we generated solid operating cash flow during the fourth quarter. During Q4 of fiscal 2018, we had cash flow from operations of $26 million and $35.8 million respectively. This reflects an increase of 185.7% over fiscal 2017 cash flow from operations of $12.5 million. For fiscal 2018, we generated $29.1 million in free cash flow. While we're always looking to enhance and improve our cash flow generation, we are comfortable with where we are at, at the end of the year, with further improvements in the future.

Return on invested capital or ROIC increased 770 basis points from 2017 to 28.8% and continues to improve, as we drive margins and operating leverage. This return does reflect an adjustment to the tax rate assumption used in the calculation to both fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018.

In terms of our capital structure; at December 31, our fixed charge coverage rate was 3.5 to 1 and our secured leverage ratio was 2.2 to 1. Total debt outstanding at December 31st was $248.7 million. In conclusion, we're pleased with our ability to have nine sequential quarters of increases in quarterly sales per business day. This has included organic sales and acquisition growth, EBITDA margin expansion with room for improvement and significant dilutive EPS growth. Momentum has been good and we look forward to pushing this through the entirety of 2019. DXP is on its path of its financial goals, driving organic and acquisition sales growth, EBITDA margin improvement and EPS increases.

With that, now I will turn the call over for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

(Operator Instructions). Your first question comes from the line of Joe Mondillo from Sidoti & Company. Please go ahead, your line is open.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Hi guys, good afternoon.

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Hi Joe.

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Hey Joe.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Can you just repeat the gain on sale, how much that was and confirm that it hit the fourth quarter and what segment --

did that hit one of the segment operating income lines ?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

No, the gain actually occurred early in the year. You may not remember, Joe. The gain was actually in Q2. And it was just --

reflects the sale of our corporate facility and it was $1.3 million.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Okay. Right, OK. That's what I thought, I just wanted to confirm.

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, yeah. No, absolutely.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

On the Service Center side of things, organic growth was pretty good. I thought you guys were going to be going up against or I guess you were going up against sort of a tough comp -- the fourth quarter of last year. Could you just talk about the trends that you're seeing there? You mentioned that you're seeing some really good growth in the rotating equipment and Metalworking equipment, but the deceleration was not as much as I anticipated. What are you thinking as we are now into 2019?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, fair question. You always got to remember, our Service Center businesses is 80% MRO, roughly 20% OEM, and so I think I saw your note just in general, on the industry and so we -- for a majority of our business there, we benefited from that, from a maintenance spend. We also benefit from ASI. ASI was a contributor, I don't know if you're looking at on organic or a total basis, but ASI finished the year roughly $47 million, and that was ahead of plan. And so that kind of pushed us through on the service Center side as well. And so we saw strength yes, on the rotating equipment side, on the MRO side, but also ASI was a huge contributor throughout the year.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Okay. And then I feel like I ask this question almost every quarter, the margins at the Service Center segment, just sort of really tough for me to get my hands around, it seems like it's quite volatile. It has been actually pretty consistent the last few quarters, could you just comment on where you are in terms of the Service Center margins and is there more room for expansion? Are we going to have a tough comp in 2019, given the expansion that you saw in 2018? Any sort of color or insight that you can provide there, that would be helpful ?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Sure, Joe I will just walk through the trends in terms of operating income margins from Q1 in 2018 through the fourth quarter, and then I'll kind of jump to your question. Q1 operating income margins for service centers were 9%. For Q2 11.3%; for Q3 , 10.9%; and then for Q4, 11.6%. Directionally what I'm getting at is, there was, call it a little bit north of a 200 plus basis point improvement of operating income margins. For the year, 10.76% operating income margins. Historically, that business has kind of been -- call it in the 12%, maybe at the most, 14% operating income margins range. And so we're seeing improvement and we did through 2018. If we keep the trend, we're starting to get to the higher end of that and so -- but that's natural, that typically comes once again as we get strength in our rotating equipment business, and it somewhat becomes a reflection of mix.

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

So some of that Joe -- Joe, some of that is scale. I think the bouncing of those margins. I think are consistent with whether we had a higher sales month -- sales quarter or not and realize that our peak in 2014 was $1.5 billion. So we still have ways to go to get back to where our peak was, and so as we do that, certainly our operating income as a percent of sales, is going to grow. The other piece of that is gross profit and that's a function of people again, not being so scared to get a decent margin on stuff, instead of just feeling like they have to sell it at any price. So I feel good about that. The only thing coming that we look as -- we look at this as an opportunity, is that our manufacturers that we represent are having price increases and so our customers are kind of accustomed to price increases. So we tag along and add a percent for ourselves. And that tends to work.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Okay. And then -- so looking at 2019 as a segment -- as a whole, service center, it seems like growth is moderating in the industry. Not sure if you agree or if you have started to see that within your business for the first two months of this year. Is it fair to say that you should probably see moderating growth at Service Center in 2019, and maybe not as much of an expansion in margin, but continue to see expansion margin in 2019, is that sort of the general theme that you're sort of expecting?

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

We're not expecting any decline in sales for the service centers.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

No, I was talking about growth, like a deceleration of growth? Still growth for you -- in moderation.

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes, right. And I think that's fair. Certainly fair based on -- it was fair back in November and December, when we thought the sky was falling. But it hasn't played out. We seem to be tracking January and February pretty nicely. So we feel like, yes, we're going to do 16% organically again. It's possible, but it's not probable, and so I'm going to have to knowing what I know today, think that it will be less. But (inaudible) much less.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Okay. Just sort of a broad question on the oil and gas sector; it seems like the estimates out there are calling to sort of E&P CapEx budgets being slightly down this year, integrated company sort of flat to slightly up. So the CapEx budget seemed sort of maybe flattish, maybe potentially down, maybe potentially up, given that environment and looking at the rig count and all these other indicators, it looks like a pretty significant slowdown, but you're coming off of end of 2018, that was very volatile and oil prices have since rebounded. What is your sort of take on sort of how 2019 looks? Are you anticipating continued growth in your oil and gas markets? Just any sort of color there would be really helpful?

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Right. So the the midstream people and people putting new pipelines in, in the States, that activity -- first of all, we have a large backlog of that kind of activity where we've already sold it and then our quoting levels still are good. So we're probably seeing nice growth in midstream. And then when we look at drilling activity, which we don't care about, I think that it will be lesser of that. I think when people cut their CapEx budgets, I think the drilling activity is one of the areas that they will look at cutting. The question becomes, where we play is, after they frac a well. So they create a duct, they drilled it, but it's not completed yet, there's 4,000 to 6,000 out there, I don't know exactly. But when they complete those and the oil gets above the ground, that's when we really start playing. So in the area where we play, we're not thinking that we're going to see a decline.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Okay. And then so IPS, that's obviously a big part of this sector and the fundamentals that you just spoke of, what does the backlog -- you mentioned that backlog grew -- continued to grow throughout 2018. Has it started to decelerate in terms of the year-over-year comp and how has that sort of trended into 2019, just trying to get a sense of what kind of growth we are sort of anticipating for 2019 there?

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

So that's a good question and really yes, we've seen our backlog is still growing, but it isn't as robust as it was at the beginning of last year. So the question that we have is why, and because there's still a lot of activity, there's still a lot of quoting activity. So the question is, are people just starting to be a little more conservative, because they think they got to kind of watch supply and demand. They don't want to get way too far ahead of the demand curve, because then all of a sudden, oil prices will go down and they have financial difficulties. We all remember 2015 and 2016 quite well. And so I think there's a lot of conservatism out there. But again, we think that if OPEC continues to cut production, if Russia continues to follow suit, if we're not giving Iran a free pass, and if China and United States can kind of get their -- this tariff back in some sort of reasonableness, then we could -- in oil and gas, we could still have a -- we could go back to a pretty big boom.

I want to really make this distinction that the industrial market has been on an up cycle for this 10-year period it looks like everybody thinks that after 10 years, it has got to go down. And that may or may not happen, I don't quite know how taxes and those things are going to play out. But from an oil and gas point of view, we have not been in an up cycle. We really wouldn't get up cycle till 2017. So we got 2017 and 2018 and so there's really not any reason to think that oil and gas will continue to be a really, really good market and really we prefer, if I could just say this, we prefer a more stable oil and gas market than the one that shoots up to $110 a barrel of oil and gas goes down to $2. I mean, if we could just have stability, then that's really better for us and we will perform really quite nicely.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Okay, great. Perfect. Thanks for taking my questions and good luck.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Blake Hirschman from Stephens. Please go ahead, your line is open.

Blake Hirschman -- Stephens Inc. -- Analyst

Yes, good afternoon guys. Great quarter. First, just wanted to ask about ex-ASI organic margins. I think I heard you say 27.7% and I think that was full year, but wanted to clarify and then as a follow-up to that, could you kind of talk through some of the drivers of that organic margin expansion? I think you mentioned engineered-to-order in Canada, but just kind of wanted to get a little bit more color there?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

You're correct, Blake. Sans ASI gross margins were 27.7%. Just to retrace so a little bit of the history, real quick, we troughed the Q3 and we troughed partially because of the two businesses you mentioned Canadian Safety Services, and our engineered to order business. We are seeing continued improvement in both of those businesses throughout 2018 really since Q3 of last year. So that's -- on the the Safety Services side, it's in spite of the revenue actually being down on a year-over-year basis. But the gross margins are not back to where they have been. Their gross margins are probably still off, roughly around 39 basis points from some other peaks. And so while we're pleased once again with the direction and kind of what they've done, you heard it probably in our comments, there is still room for improvement on the gross margin side and so we look to continue to see that going forward.

Engineered-to-order, part of that was just a scale aspect. We needed volumes to pick up -- engineered to orders within our IPS business segment and so we saw some of that -- David's comments throughout the last couple of quarters has quoted his -- the IPS backlog and that has continued to grow. So with that scale, some of that is just some fixed cost leverage you get out of that business as you move through the cycle. And so I think that's what you're seeing in that business as well.

Blake Hirschman -- Stephens Inc. -- Analyst

Got it. All right. And then wanted to see what the monthly sales per day looked like throughout the 4Q and curious if you could give us any update on what January or February looked like?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, absolutely. So sales per business day through the quarter for Q4 for October was $4.7 million, November was $5.0 million, December was $5.4 million. In 2019 year, little sales flash for January and February, $4.5 million for January and $5.1 million for February.

Blake Hirschman -- Stephens Inc. -- Analyst

$5.1 million, OK. And then lastly, on capital allocation and more specifically M&A, wanted to get an update on how you're thinking about things, how the conversations are going and if you guys think you're getting closer to kind of closing anything here? Thanks a lot.

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, in terms of acquisitions, obviously 2018 was a year where we were coming fresh off our refinancing toward the back end of 2017. And so we did a repricing, we paid down some debt we have light amortization on that facility and then we're also building cash, ending the year with $40 million plus of cash on the balance sheet. We can never time those conversations, as I always say, but we engaged more heavily in dialogs in 2018, that is for sure. And so hopefully we'll see some of the fruit of that here in 2019, kind of as we move through the year. And obviously, that has always been a key aspect of our strategy and we look to accelerate that, but you heard that David and I's comments, but we don't have any secret sauce in terms of turning these guys into sellers immediately.

Blake Hirschman -- Stephens Inc. -- Analyst

Got it. Thanks and good luck.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Steve Barger from KeyBanc Capital. Please go ahead, your line is open.

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

Good afternoon, guys. This is Ryan Mills on for Steve and congrats on the quarter.

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks.

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

Yes, wanted to talk about IPS and pump works. I think it's obvious to say you've taken share given the top line performance. So can you talk a little bit about what your customers are saying and what's driving the momentum for that business?

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. We actually -- this is going to sound quite interesting, but we actually have and produced a Made in America pump versus oftentimes others with pumps in Italy or components made in China etcetera. So we usually have a more expensive pump. It's not out of line expensive, but it tends to be a little more expensive. So why are we successful? Well, we're successful because of the flipside of that is, is our supply channel is all in America and so we can simply do it faster.

And delivery is important, which in the oil and gas and Midstream marketplaces, that's important. Downstream, not so much. So we're not quite as successful downstream. But we make a better pump. We make it exactly like the customer wants it, and we do it faster.

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

Okay. And then I believe on your last earnings call, you said you had an advantage because your pumps are Made in America. So how your price is shaping up compared to the competitors who are experienced in tariff driven inflation, is that kind of level in the playing field, because on your last earnings call, I think you said the price increases you're seeing in your pumps business was 4% to 5% compared to the double-digit increases at some competitors, who source overseas might be seen?

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Right. So we haven't seen the major players closer (inaudible) really come out with any kind of 20% price increases. So that hasn't panned out, as much as we would have hoped for. The key again is that our -- and really Made in America is great, as long as you are competitive. It's not -- people aren't going to buy Made in America, if it costs twice as much. They're just not going to do it. So they'd like to, but they're not going to. So we have to be competitive, so we're close. What really drives a premium, is fast delivery, that drives the premium. The American -- if we are equal and we are Made in America, that may win us the order.

If we're 20% higher Made in America we're not going to get the order. What gets the order too, is that our salesmen have relationships with these accounts. So we have some influence on the channel, as it relates to our salesmen and the customers that we're dealing with. They like us. We're fast. We are convenient. We provide technical support. We build the customer the pump that he wants, its custom-made oftentimes. So all of those things add up to a differentiation that allows us to make a good margin, even though our product is a little more expensive, and so -- and then to answer specifically, the tariffs had not panned out to be a big-big deal.

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

Okay. Just a couple more for me, solid free cash flow this quarter and your net working capital actually ticked up throughout the the year. So I'm just curious about your free cash flow expectations at 2019 and should we start to see a working capital draw down or do you still expect that we use of cash in 2019?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

No Steve, what we experienced in 2018 was this gradual pickup. I think we peaked out in terms of working capital as a percentage of sales, around 18% and that really reflected our growth and the cost and estimated profits are basically our project business. And so that backlog continues to build. We will go through that similar cycle more than likely in 2019. But what happened at the back end of 2018, as a lot of those job ships shipped and we did a better job, which I think has stressed organizationally, in terms of collecting on those jobs. Those jobs are subject to progress, billings and some other things and so you see the difference between those balance sheet accounts narrowed in Q4 and so that created the free cash flow and thus, a lesser drain on working capital, as a percent of sales ending the year at that 16% range. And so I think that's what we would normally expect, just in our core distribution business, the 15% to 16% range and then with our project business, when we invest in that, it tends to drive it up slightly.

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

Okay. And then going to your -- the oil and gas markets that you play in, earlier this week, there was a report out describing lower productivity rates from the wells, because they are being drilled too close together. Are you hearing anything from that, in regards to that from your customers and what are your thoughts on the implications for that completions, if this is true?

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, oil and gases are both depleting resource. So the question is, are we experiencing depletion faster than what we anticipate? And I'm not hearing that. We know and I know -- I happened participate in oil well and in Eagle Ford as an example, I mean it comes in it at thousands of barrels a day and then it drops down -- it drops down 80% by the end of that year. But then at that level it kind of levels out and how long it will last, who knows. But, they don't keep going down to just zero.

So there is this curve, where you drill a well, you get a lot of production for a year, then it drops down. That is the reason why -- I guess the oil and gas business until we all go to solar or wind turbines, will continue to exist, even if we're not trying to do any more than just maintain existing production. And so we feel good about that. We actually make more money on parts and aftermarket, and because we're kind of a newbie on -- with pump works, we don't have a lot of parts in aftermarket at this particular stage. Our aftermarket businesses is frankly our competitor's pumps, not our pumps.

So there's things to come, that will be beneficial and as long as we don't have huge swings where price of oil goes to $24 or it goes to $100, either one of those things, really stability is a lot better for us, and it's really better for the country too. So I don't know if that answers your question, but that was my thought process.

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

That's good. And then my last question, IPS has been growing at a solid clip for about seven consecutive quarters. So I'm just curious, when do you expect to see a nice benefit from the aftermarket business? Are you starting to see that now and then could you just talk about the margin profile?

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

So, it is -- we actually our parts business at pump works, I believe -- I think this is right. I'm not sure I could get you the exact number, but it doubled from the year before. But it wasn't a big number, if you double zero, it's still zero. But if we doubled it, it will continue -- it will probably double again this year, and so it's just a matter of getting pumps out there now. Now pump works API product line has been out there -- they were in the business at least five year before we purchased them. So they have some history out there and etcetera. So we're getting some of that business, and it is at high margins and then we, like I said, we get the competitions' aftermarket also.

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Steve, just bouncing back on your free cash flow question. Another way to think about that obviously is our free cash flow conversion -- our conversion on there. Sometimes when I'm talking to folks in a more growing market, usually we typically expect 25% to 35% free cash flow conversion. And so I think for the year, this year we finished around that 30% range, so that's in line, but the quarters in between is where the noise is at, I guess it was my point earlier I was just trying to make.

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Sort of my point, am I wrong about this Kent? I think if we have organic growth of 20%, well then we're going to use a lot of our free cash flow supporting that 20% growth. But if it's more normal and it's 10%, well then we'll have a bigger buildup of cash. I mean, so it's just a function and then the number is, well can we have 15% to 17% of sales in working capital. So that's a pretty low number. So we can have a pretty high growth number and not burn all our cash, which is just proof of the fact that bought the company in 1986 and grew it to $1.5 billion and during that time cycle, we only raised $25 million one-time. So the cash flow is being generated.

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

Yeah. So that makes sense and so just targeting that 25% to 35% in 2019 as well ?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, I think so. Once again, I was just trying to emphasize that there is noise just dependent upon, because of our project business. But to David's point, it's also a mix of where our growth comes from once again, if we -- I think it was Joe at Sidoti who asked about Service Centers, but more of our growth is coming through service centers, and that's not going to require as much. So once again it just depends in the quarters where that growth comes from too, so.

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

All right. Thanks for taking my questions.

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Absolutely.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Mondillo from Sidoti & Company. Please go ahead, your line is open.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Hey guys. Most of my questions were actually answered, I actually tried to withdraw. But just one or two clarification questions; the tax rate that you're sort of thinking about for this year, what would that be?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, going back to tax reform Joe, I gave a range around 28% to 30%. This year, we are around 27%. I think the lower end of that range is still applicable -- year-over-year, we had some remeasurement adjustments. It makes us look different than most, where our tax rate actually looks like, it went up in 2018 versus 2017. But I think just in terms of kind of directionally, we're probably at the lower end, if you will, that range back at the end of 2017 when I said 28% to 30%.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Okay. And then last question, just the 13.4% operating margin at the IPS segment, how do you think about that as sort of a benchmark? Or I mean or -- as we go into the beginning of 2019, are you going to see sort of potential of under that number or is that sort of a low bar and going forward, you should see improvement from there?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Right. So once again, and then I'll just trace the trends for everybody else on the call, IPS through the quarters, we had 9.4% operating income margins, 12.1% operating income margins, 11.4% operating income margins, and then we ended the year with 13.4% operating income margins. We do have a different mix of business today than we have had historically in the past. I know we've peaked up around to 20% operating income margin today, but I wouldn't want anyone necessarily to have those higher end expectations. I think our business today, the mix is totally different. That said, is there room to go from 13.4%? Absolutely. Once again, it is also going to depend upon mix. We have a measurement business, LACT and ACT units that tends to be a little bit lower margin and that's some of my comments around mix. But then we also have some other higher margin API and different things related to that.

So it's all going to be a mix and how we fall out.

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

So Joe, you remember when we had 16% operating income margins in that area and basically in those days, we were doing a lot more offshore work and the complexity and the value-add was higher and so we made higher margins on offshore stuff. And so today we do very little offshore. So it's more onshore and so it's not quite as technical and so therefore the value adds, it's easier for other people to do it too. So our competition is a little greater. So that's part of it and so I'll just remind you about that.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

How does the the pump works -- wasn't there sort of some funky way of accounting? I remember this from a year or two ago, at least I guess, where -- the revenue, up until breakeven was accounted for in the Service Center segment, and then sort of the profits beyond that were accounted for in the IPS, is that anywhere as correct or how does the accounting, in terms of profitability at the pump works business play?

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

It doesn't play like that. What does happen, is that a manufacturing facility like the pump works, almost every body has a pretty high fixed cost versus a distribution business, where people really are your highest fixed cost as people. Yet people are variable too, so you can get rid of them, whereas when you have this plant, and you've got all this equipment and you got all that stuff, you got to have high fixed costs. So what does happen almost for everybody, is that as you cover that fixed costs, your variable costs are not that high. So your margins will go up with volume.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Right. No, that makes sense, but where is your in-house manufactured pumps accounted for? Is it in the Service Center segment or IPS?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

No -- it's in IPS.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

It is in IPS? Okay. And that would -- as we go down the road, maybe it's not in a quarter or two, but as that start ramps up, becomes a bigger percentage, that should help increase the ceiling to margins over time, correct ?

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Absolutely, yes.

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Okay, great. Thank you.

Operator

There are no further questions at this time. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

Duration: 67 minutes

Call participants:

Kent Yee -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

David R. Little -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Joseph Mondillo -- Sidoti and Company -- Analyst

Blake Hirschman -- Stephens Inc. -- Analyst

Ryan Mills -- Key Bank Capital -- Analyst

More DXPE analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.